The student picks a side of the case, argues for three rounds and the judge hands down a verdict with reasons.
A file of evidence prepared from your material, two positions, a rival who cheats and a verdict per criterion that you mark as fair or not.
No card. Three tries a day without creating an account.
The AI prepares it from your material, and you edit any sentence in place.
The AI goes through evidence, generation, repair and evaluation, and it is published only if it passed the quality check. There is no creation by hand.
With the AI, from your material
You choose the material and the difficulty, accessible with 2 rounds and 12 minimum words, or demanding with 3 rounds and 15, and see the cost before asking.
Afterwards, in place
You edit the thesis, the evidence, Damián's and the witnesses' lines, and the judge's criteria, each thing where it is.
What you decide about the tribunal
The rest comes with the case.
- 01100 XP by default.
- 02The official window.
- 03The audience.
Defend or rebut, alone or in pairs, and answer each attack with a piece from the file.
- 01Writes with the builder or with the pen.
- 02One witness per side.
- 03Objects when the rival commits the fallacy and, when it applies, it counts in the verdict.
- 04Credibility starts at 3; at 0 the trial ends with no XP.
- 05At the end, the verdict out of 100 per criterion and the seal, Convincing from 78, Solid from 55, Missing evidence below.
- 06The weakest point and a question to think about.
- 07Courtroom music on the web and 9 sound effects on the phone.
The class seals, the rival's trick and the group's weakest criterion.
- 01The seals split by position.
- 02The rival's trick, with who stopped it with an objection and who used it as an argument.
- 03The judge's criteria with the group's weakest.
- 04Student by student with score per criterion, credibility and XP.
- 05The full plea, round by round.
- 06“Fair verdict?” with thumbs up or down for each verdict, and “Useful” or “Could be better” for the case.
Five kinds of evidence, with an example from the phone case.
- TypeAn example from the case
- 01Quote“Every notification interrupts twice, when it arrives and when you keep thinking about it.”
- 02ConceptDigital citizenship is learned by using technology responsibly and with someone alongside.
- 03FactIn the activity 2 survey, most of the class says they check the phone even when nothing has arrived.
- 04PrincipleA rule is followed better when the people who must follow it helped write it.
- 05TestimonyA student says they lose the thread of the explanation every time they check a message.
The file brings 7 to 9 pieces. At least 2 serve only to defend, 2 only to rebut and 2 serve neither.
The judge scores out of 100 and writes the reason for each criterion.
- 01Clarity, 25. It is clear what they defend and why.
- 02Evidence, 35. They use pieces from the file that truly support their side.
- 03Rebuttal, 25. They answer the other side's best argument, not an easy one.
- 04Tone, 15. They argue the idea, not the person.
The screens are from the product. The names, grades and dates are examples.
The other activities